|
KUSP provides
a brief Land Use Report on KUSP Radio. Tune in every weekday at 6:33 or 8:49 am.
KUSP is at 88.9 FM in General Coverage, 105.9 FM in Big Sur Valley, 91.3 FM in
Palo Colorado Canyon, and 91.7 FM in San Ardo. Archives of past transcripts are
available here.
Week
of December 15, 2003 to December 19, 2003
- Monday,
December 15, 2003 Marina Coast Water District
- Tuesday,
December 16, 2003 Scotts Valley City Council
- Wednesday,
December 17, 2003 Tree Protection
- Thursday,
December 18, 2003 Carmel Valley Road Committee
- Friday,
December 19, 2003 The Seaside Lawsuit
The following Land Use Reports have been presented on KUSP Radio by Gary Patton, Executive Director of LandWatch Monterey County. The opinions expressed by Mr. Patton are not necessarily those of KUSP Radio, nor of any of its sponsors.
Monday,
December 15, 2003 Marina Coast Water District
Senate Bill 610, state legislation adopted in 2001, requires cities
and counties, before approving residential developments of over
500 units, to obtain a Water Supply Assessment from the local water
district. This Water Supply Assessment must be included in the Environmental
Impact Report on the proposed project. As a practical matter, this
means that it must be available for public comment, prior to any
final decision on the proposed new development.
It
appears that the Marina Heights project, in Marina, has run afoul
of this new, and quite logical, law. The Marina City Council is
poised to approve the Marina Heights project, but the water district
has not yet produced its Water Supply Assessment, and the public
has certainly not had its opportunity to comment. The issues involved
arent technicalities. Water supplies in Marina
are very scarce, and the groundwater aquifer from which that water
comes is threatened by toxic contamination and seawater intrusion.
If water is provided to the proposed Marina Heights development,
which is essentially upper income homes, there may not be any water
for job producing developments.
Tonight
at 7:00 oclock, the Marina Coast Water District will consider
this controversial subject. You can get more information by clicking
on the Land Use Report link at www.kusp.org.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Senate
Bill 610
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/01-02/bill/sen/sb_0601-
0650/sb_610_bill_20011009_chaptered.html
Marina
Coast Water District Website
http://www.mcwd.org/
City
of Marina Website
http://www.ci.marina.ca.us/
LandWatch
Letter on Marina Heights Project
http://www.landwatch.org/pages/issuesactions/
marina/111903marinaheights.html
LandWatch
Letter on Water Supply Assessment
http://www.landwatch.org
Tuesday,
December 16, 2003 Scotts Valley City Council
The Scotts Valley City Council will be meeting tomorrow evening
at 6:00 p.m. A couple of items are worthy of note, and those interested
in land use policy might well want to take in this meeting. The
Council meets at the Scotts Valley City Hall, right off Scotts Valley
Drive, and the Citys website has a complete agenda packet
available for you, so you can dig into the agenda in detail. By
the way, if there are any local officials listening, the idea of
making the entire agenda packet available on the web is a very good
idea. At least if youd like the public to have a chance to
be informed, and to participate. The County of Santa Cruz does it.
Scotts Valley does it. But many public agencies dont.
Tomorrow,
the Scotts Valley City Council will appoint a creek habitat subcommittee
to explore what sort of development standards should be established,
to protect the citys riparian creeks and habitats. Land use
policies will either protect natural resources, or not, depending
on what those policies are. This is an important effort by the City
of Scotts Valley. Its Agenda Item #2.
Agenda
Item #3 is an update report on the draft population, employment,
and housing units forecast prepared through the Association of Monterey
Bay Area Governments. Professional planners always begin with the
numbers. If youd like to understand how those numbers are
developed, show up at that Scotts Valley City Council meeting tomorrow
night.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Scotts
Valley Website
http://www.scottsvalley.org
City
Council Agenda Packet for December 17, 2003
http://www.scottsvalley.org/cca.PDF
Wednesday,
December 17, 2003 Tree Protection
Most of our natural resources, or maybe I should say our remaining
natural resources, are found outside of our cities. Once weve
decided to build a city, or to urbanize formerly open lands, we
expect to lose some, or most, of the natural features that might
have been there earlier. Good planning is actually based on the
idea that our communities should decide what areas need to be protected
for their natural resource values, and what areas should be urbanized
and developed. Then, its the job of our county governments,
generally, to say no to proposals to develop in the
natural areas. Unfortunately, county governments dont always
do a very good job of holding the line. That gives us
the kind of sprawl that is all too familiar to us.
Theres
another aspect to natural resource protection, however. Arent
there some natural resources inside our cities that are worth protecting?
This is the issue at the Scotts Valley City Council tonight, where
theyll talk about creek habitat protection, for riparian areas
inside the city. Its also the issue before the City of Santa
Cruz Planning Commission, which will consider the proposed removal
of a heritage tree. The City of Santa Cruz has decided that there
are natural resources, inside the city, that are worth protecting.
Large trees are one of them. If youd like to get involved,
the Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. tonight.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
City
of Santa Cruz Website
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/
City
Planning Commission Agenda
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/pl/cpc/agenda.pdf
Heritage
Tree Ordinance
http://nt2.scbbs.com/cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?clientID=
206921&infobase=procode-1&softpage=Browse_Frame_Pg
City
Council Agenda Packet for December 17, 2003
http://www.scottsvalley.org/cca.PDF
Thursday,
December 18, 2003 Carmel Valley Road Committee
I can remember talking, a few weeks ago, about the Multi-Agency
meetings that are held periodically in Big Sur. Those meetings are
often full of controversy and contention, as the residents of Big
Sur take on their governmental agencies, from CALTRANS to the Coastal
Commission, trying to make them respond to the concerns of the Big
Sur community. Those meetings in Big Sur are lots of fun, and truly
represent democracy in action.
Today,
theres a similar meeting coming up, but its a meeting
of the Carmel Valley Road Committee, to be held in Carmel Valley.
The residents of that area, like the residents of Big Sur, are not
at all bashful about letting their governmental officials know what
they think. What they think, by and large, is that Carmel Valley
is one of the most spectacular geographic areas in the world, different
from but fully equivalent to Big Sur, and they want to make sure
its protected. Traffic issues, as in Big Sur, are a hot topic
in Carmel Valley.
The
meeting begins at 1:30 p.m., at the Mid-Valley Fire Station. If
youre a Carmel Valley resident, you might want to attend.
On the agenda is a discussion of what I understand is a proposal
to eliminate language in the draft General Plan Update that many
Carmel Valley residents believe is vitally necessary to prevent
the over-development of Carmel Valley.
Find
out more by clicking on the Land Use Report link at www.kusp.org.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
More
information on the Carmel Valley Road Committee and its meeting
on December 18th can be obtained from Monterey County Supervisor
Dave Potter. Contact Supervisor Potter or his Aide, Kathleen Lee,
at 831-647-7755 (from Monterey), or 831-755-5055 (from Salinas),
or 831-667-2770 (from Big Sur). You can email Supervisor Potter
at district5@co.monterey.ca.us.
Friday,
December 19, 2003 The Seaside Lawsuit
The City of Seaside approved a major residential development for
KB Homes, one of the largest residential builders in the United
States. This development has been controversial, especially because
it contains absolutely no housing that is affordable to anyone with
an average or below average income. All the homes in Seaside
Highlands sell for more than half a million dollars apiece,
and many buyers are from out of the area, since theres no
preference given to local residents or workers.
Most
controversial has been the way that KB Homes acquired the property.
The property is part of the former Fort Ord, and was purchased from
the Army by the City of Seaside, which immediately resold the land
to the developer. The City of Seaside made a profit of about $750,000
(total) on this sale. The City then approved a development of about
380 homes, and as I said earlier, all of those homes will sell for
more than $500,000 apiece. $500,000 times 380 is $190,000,000. Thats
the gross income to the developer. The people of the City get $750
grand. A lawsuit is challenging this financial arrangement as a
giveaway of a public asset, and the Trial Court Judge has ruled
the plaintiffs are likely to win. Today, at 10:00 a.m., KB Homes
is making a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Proceedings are at Judge
Kingsleys Courtroom, in Monterey, and youre very welcome
to attend.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Monterey
County Herald News Story
http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/
news/local/6487489.htm
Legal
Documents in Seaside Lawsuit:
Archives
of past transcripts are available here
|