|
KUSP provides
a brief Land Use Report on KUSP Radio. Tune in every weekday at 6:33 or 8:49 am.
KUSP is at 88.9 FM in General Coverage, 105.9 FM in Big Sur Valley, 91.3 FM in
Palo Colorado Canyon, and 91.7 FM in San Ardo. Archives of past transcripts are
available here.
Week
of November 3, 2003 to November 7, 2003
- Monday,
November 3, 2003 California Wilderness Coalition
- Tuesday,
November 4, 2003 East Garrison Development
- Wednesday,
November 5, 2003 More on East Garrison
- Thursday,
November 6, 2003 Seaside GPU At The City Council
- Friday,
November 7, 2003 California Futures Network
The following Land Use Reports have been presented on KUSP Radio by Gary Patton, Executive Director of LandWatch Monterey County. The opinions expressed by Mr. Patton are not necessarily those of KUSP Radio, nor of any of its sponsors.
Monday,
November 3, 2003 California Wilderness Coalition
The California Wilderness Coalition is holding a party this coming
Saturday, to honor Senator Barbara Boxer and Congress Member Sam
Farr. The occasion for the celebration is the enactment of the Big
Sur Wilderness and Conservation Act, signed into law by President
Bush in December of last year.
The
Big Sur Wilderness and Conservation Act was authored
by Congress Member Farr. It expanded the Ventana Wilderness, adding
nearly 35,000 acres. The Silver Peak Wilderness, created in 1992,
was more than doubled in size. 2,715 acres were added to the Pinnacles
National Monument Wilderness, located in San Benito County.
The
bill had its beginnings in the summer of 1998 when the Ventana Wilderness
Alliance began an inventory of roadless areas in the Los Padres
National Forest. The results of this inventory helped lay the groundwork
for Congress Member Farrs legislation. According to the California
Wilderness Coalition, phttp://www.calwild.org/photos/content/cc/coastridge1b.jpgassage
of the Act would not have been possible without extraordinary efforts
by both Representative Farr and Senator Boxer. As is often the case,
the KUSP website can guide you to more information. If youll
click on the Land Use Report link at www.kusp.org, youll get
a full briefing on what the celebration is all about.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
California
Wilderness Coalition
http://www.calwild.org/
Party
Invitation
http://www.calwild.org/help/celebrate.php
Big
Sur Wilderness and Conservation Act
http://www.calwild.org/campaigns/cwhc_act/bigsur.php
Ventana
Wilderness Alliance
http://www.ventanawild.org/
Tuesday,
November 4, 2003 East Garrison Development
Redevelopment of Fort Ord is taking place inside various different
local jurisdictions. The KB Home project in the City of Seaside
is quite visibly underway, right next to Highway One. The proposed
Marina Heights project, in the City of Marina, is about three times
as large as the KB Home project, and has advanced a good way into
the planning process. It may face a vote at the Marina City Council
later this year. A proposed project in the City of Del Rey Oaks
is in a preliminary design phase. The City of Monterey will also
be redeveloping a small portion of the former Fort Ord.
One
of the most interesting proposals for redeveloping Fort Ord is in
the unincorporated area, way on the other side of Fort Ord. This
is the so-called East Garrison project, which plans
to utilize new urbanist techniques that arent
being employed in any of the other projects. The principles of new
urbanism call for walkable neighborhoods, mixed uses, housing
affordability by design, and the integration of civic and commercial
uses into local neighborhoods. Its a great concept, and Monterey
County and the local developer, called Woodman Development, should
be congratulated for their willingness to try out in real life some
the planning concepts that have gotten great critical reviews. If
youd like to learn more about the East Garrison Development,
tune in tomorrow, when Ill continue this discussion.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
East
Garrison Schedule
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pressrel/EGarrisonschedule.pdf
East
Garrison Option Agreement
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/GarrisonProj.pdf
LandWatch
Critique of Option Agreement
http://www.landwatch.org/pages/issuesactions/fortord/020503woodman.html
County
Redevelopment Plan For Fort Ord
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pressrel/RFP9701RedvlpmntPln.pdf
Developers
Brochure East Garrison Project
Pages 1-6 - http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pressrel/EGarrisona.pdf
Pages 7-12 - http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pressrel/EGarrisonb.pdf
Wednesday,
November 5, 2003 More on East Garrison
If youll visit www.kusp.org, youll find some very pretty
pictures of what the proposed East Garrison development might look
like. I talked about this proposed development yesterday. Its
located at the furthest reaches of the former Fort Ord, in an area
under the jurisdiction of the Monterey County Board of Supervisors.
The
developer has brought in new urbanist designers to make
the proposed East Garrison project something special. There are
some problems, however. The whole idea of new urbanism
is to integrate new development into a compact, urban design. This
proposed project is definitely a skip, and a hop, and a jump, and
a long way from anything else. There seems to be a bit of an internal
contradiction, in other words. Its too bad that Marina and
Seaside havent focused on the advantages of new urbanism,
since they actually have some urban areas to develop.
Perhaps
even more important, the County and the developer have entered into
an Option Agreement that gives an awful lot of advantages to the
developer. Of course, thats no different from what Seaside
and Marina have done. All the local jurisdictions with land on Fort
Ord seem quite anxious to transfer title from the public to various
private developers. To find out a whole lot more about the East
Garrison project, I do encourage you to visit the KUSP website.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
East
Garrison Schedule
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pressrel/EGarrisonschedule.pdf
East
Garrison Option Agreement
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/GarrisonProj.pdf
LandWatch
Critique of Option Agreement
http://www.landwatch.org/pages/issuesactions/fortord/020503woodman.html
County
Redevelopment Plan For Fort Ord
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pressrel/RFP9701RedvlpmntPln.pdf
Developers
Brochure East Garrison Project
Pages 1-6 - http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pressrel/EGarrisona.pdf
ßPages 7-12 - http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pressrel/EGarrisonb.pdf
Thursday,
November 6, 2003 Seaside GPU At The City Council
Tonight, at 7:00 oclock, the Seaside City Council will consider
its proposed General Plan Update. The Council meets at the Seaside
City Hall, 440 Harcourt Avenue. Tonights meeting isnt
the last chance to get your comments in, but the hour
is getting late. The Council is scheduled to take final action at
its meeting on November 20th.
The
complete Draft Seaside General Plan Update is available online.
I encourage you to review the Draft, and to let the City Council
know what you think. A communitys General Plan is the single
most important document governing land use and development. The
General Plan really does chart the future of the community, so the
community needs to get engaged at the General Plan level. All too
often, we start paying attention to planning issues only when a
specific project is proposed. Thats late in the game, because
the policies to which every project must conform are almost always
incorporated in or based on the General Plan.
Whether
the issue is parks, street widths, height limits, the design of
shopping centers, or affordable housing, the General Plan is the
place where policy statements can have the most effect. If youll
click on the Land Use Report link at www.kusp.org, youll find
directions to the Seaside General Plan Update. You can take it from
there.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Seaside
City Website
http://bbs.ci.seaside.ca.us/
General
Plan Update Document
http://www.ci.seaside.ca.us/general%20plan/gp.htm
Friday,
November 7, 2003 California Futures Network
I talk mostly about local government, since local government has
the most direct impact on land use policy. State government, however,
is ultimately in charge. That means its worth our while to
pay attention to what the State Legislature and various state agencies
are doing about land use policy.
One
way to stay informed (providing you have email access) is to sign
up for the bulletins put out periodically by the California Futures
Network. CFN is a statewide coalition that works for state land
use reform, and for land use policies that are fiscally, socially
and environmentally sound. CFN has about ninety affiliate members,
including representatives of business, labor, local government,
social justice, and environmental organizations. LandWatch Monterey
County, for instance, is a member. CFN affiliates think California
should steer public and private investments toward existing developed
areas; provide for increased social justice, economic, and housing
opportunities; and conserve the state's agricultural and natural
lands.
Im
happy to report that CFN has had some real success at the state
level. The passage of AB 857, last year, has established some land
use priorities for California that could make a huge difference
to the future growth and development of the state. Ill tell
you more
next week.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
California
Futures Network
http://www.calfutures.org
CFN
Legislative Action Guide
http://www.calfutures.org/Action%20Guide.pdf
CFN
Monthly Bulletin Land Use Lines
http://www.calfutures.org/resource/LUL/LUL_Sep03.html
Archives
of past transcripts are available here
|