|
May
14, 2003
[Sent
by FAX: 831-899-6227]
Mayor
Jerry Smith and Council Members
Seaside City Council
Seaside City Hall
440 Harcourt Avenue
Seaside, CA 93955-0810
RE:
Proposed Seaside Housing Element
Meeting of May 15, 2003 - Agenda Item # 15
Dear
Mayor Smith and Council Members:
LandWatch
Monterey County has reviewed the draft Seaside Housing Element that
will come before you on May 15, 2003. We can summarize our views
by saying, Seaside can (and should) do better.
We
note, preliminarily, that Pages H-1 and H-2 of the draft Housing
Element claim that public participation played an important
role in the formulation of Seasides housing goals and policies.
From our perspective, this statement is simply not true. The comprehensive
update to the Citys General Plan referenced on Page
H-2 hasnt taken place yet, and the public participation
component to that General Plan Update process has not occurred.
Therefore, since it hasnt occurred for the entire General
Plan Update, it hasnt occurred for the Housing Element, either.
In fact, LandWatch last wrote Seaside on April 7, 2003, in a letter
to your Planning Service Manager, complaining about the lack of
public participation in the General Plan Update process. Subsequent
to our letter, the City held a brief session, with hardly any public
notice, on the Saturday before Easter, which did nothing actually
to involve the public in the General Plan process. As far as we
know, thats about it where public involvement
is concerned.
We
request the City of Seaside to defer action on the Housing Element
until after the city has, in fact, given the public the right to
learn about, and comment on, the proposed Housing Element. When
the Planning Commission met to consider the draft Housing Element,
members of the public were interested in a further opportunity to
be involved, and the Planning Commission (urged to this position
by the city staff) refused to schedule another meeting to involve
the public. Its not too late to get the public involved.
We hope you will do so.
On
the substance, we think that Seaside should do better, in terms
of including policies within the Housing Element that will help
ensure that there will be at least some opportunities in the future
for average and below average income persons to buy and rent homes
in Seaside.
As
noted on Page H-4 of the draft Housing Element, from June 2001 to
June 2002, the median sales price for a home in Seaside was $306,000.
That price has escalated since. We think that you should require
the latest data available, up to and including the last six months
of 2002. The most recent data will make even clearer that moderate,
low, and very low income persons are essentially priced out
of the Seaside housing market.
Whatever
may have been true in the past, Seaside is no longer providing any
affordable for sale housing opportunities. As existing
Seaside homes are sold at market prices (which are significantly
more than an average or below average income person can afford)
the composition of the community will changeand most working
families will no longer be able to afford a home in Seaside.
There
is something that can be done about this. The City of Seaside
should include in its Housing Element provisions requiring that
all new developments contain a minimum percentage of housing that
will be available for sale or rent to very low, low, and moderate
income persons, and that will further require that this housing
be permanently protected in terms of affordability for persons within
those income ranges.
This
is not a new, or unknown, or unprecedented
approach. The City of Marina faces the same kind of market conditions
that are affecting the housing market in Seaside. The City Council
there just adopted an updated Housing Element on April 13th, earlier
this week, and that Housing Element contained specific commitments
to provide permanent affordable housing, by establishing inclusionary
housing opportunities in all new housing developments. Marina made
a modest commitment to a 20% inclusionary requirement. If Marina
can do this, so can Seaside!
Specifically,
LandWatch urges the City of Seaside to include the following policy
in its Housing Element:
Whenever
housing is newly constructed in Seaside, a percentage of that
housing, included within each new development, shall be permanently
protected for sale or rental to persons and families with very
low, low, or moderate incomes. At least six percent (6%) of all
the new housing constructed in Seaside shall be affordable for
rental or sale to persons with very low incomes (up to 50% of
the median income of persons then residing in Monterey County);
at least seven percent (7%) of all the new housing constructed
in Seaside shall be affordable for rental or sale to persons with
low incomes (from 50% to 80% of the median income of persons then
residing in Monterey County); and at least seven percent (7%)
of all the new housing constructed in Seaside shall be affordable
for sale to persons with moderate incomes (from 80% to 120% of
the median income of persons then residing in Monterey County).
The permanent affordability of this housing for persons and families
in these income ranges shall be ensured through deed restrictions
or other equivalent and effective methods.
Conclusion
LandWatch
Monterey County is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public benefit organization
working throughout Monterey County on the important land use policy
issues that will affect the future of our communities. We are specifically
committed to policies that will make sure that new residential developments
provide affordable housing opportunities for working families. LandWatch
believes that the current and future residents of Seaside will be
grateful if the Council does everything it can to create and then
permanently maintain the maximum amount of affordable
housing possible, since unless your Council takes action now, escalating
housing prices in the future will eliminate the ability of average
and below average income families to own a home (or even rent) in
Seaside.
Thank
you for taking our views into consideration.

cc:
Interested Persons
[Return
to Seaside Issues and Actions]
posted
05.15.03
|