|
July
17, 2001
Edith
Johnsen, Chair
Monterey County Board of Supervisors
240 Church Street, 2nd Floor
Salinas, CA 93901
RE:
General Plan Update Process / Agenda for Board Meeting of July 24,
2001
Dear
Chairperson Johnsen and Members of the Board:
LandWatch
represents about a thousand members, from throughout Monterey County.
LandWatch members believe that the land use policies adopted by
and implemented by local government agencies will have a critically
important impact on the future of our local economy, on the fundamental
fairness and equity of our society, and on the health of our environment.
As
you know, LandWatch has been closely following and participating
in the Countys General Plan Update process. We believe that
the next General Plan must have strong land use policies that:
- 1.
Require new development actually to produce new housing that is
affordable to individuals and families who work in Monterey County,
and that is integrated into mixed income neighborhoods throughout
the county.
- 2.
Provide strong and secure protection for the countys prime
and commercially viable agricultural lands, which are coming under
increasing pressure for development.
- 3.
Stop urban sprawl, and direct most new growth into existing urban
areas.
- 4.
Require that the services needed by new development be provided
before or at the same time that the development is approved, and
not deferred until later. This means that new developments should
not be approved unless adequate water supplies, schools, libraries,
police and fire servicesand adequate street and highway
infrastructureare available at the time that the development
goes forward.
- 5.
Improve the permit and regulatory process, and provide certainty
about development standards and policies to developers and the
public alike.
The
County has undertaken an aggressive and largely successful public
outreach process. The Board has asked the public to tell the County
what it cares aboutand what the problems are. LandWatch is
pleased to note that the vast majority of the people who have participated
in this process have stated their strong agreement with the principles
outlined above.
Now,
it is time for the Board of Supervisors to direct the actual preparation
of a General Plan document that will include the kind of policies
that good planningand the publicdemand.
The
County Planning Commission is recommending that the General Plan
Update be prepared based on a set of "Objectives" that
they have considered at two public meetings. While we urged even
stronger statements with respect to some of these objectives, LandWatch
believes that the Commission has done an excellent job in stating
what the next General Plan should be trying to achieve. The critical
action, at this juncture, is to direct the County staff to prepare
an actual text, and a set of maps to go along with it, so that future
comment can focus on specifics.
LandWatch
thinks that more delay, at this stage, is only detrimental. As helpful
and extensive as the public outreach process has been, comments
and contributions have necessarily been limited, because they have
been focused on "generalities." When the staff has taken
the next step, and has delivered an actual text, and maps, and a
Draft EIR, it will be possible for all interested persons to make
comments that are specific and focused. The County needs to move
to that more specific level.
In
conclusion, LandWatch urges the Board of Supervisors to direct its
staff to prepare a draft General Plan Update that is based on the
Objectives recommended to the Board by the Planning Commission,
with a further direction to produce a Draft Environmental Impact
Report, concurrently.
Thank
you for taking our comments into account as you consider the General
Plan Update process at your next meeting.

cc:
County GPU Staff
County Planning Commission
[Return
to County Plan Update Issues and Actions]
|